As bacterial cells replicate their DNA, they divide, thereby producing more bacterial cells. On the other hand, in dispersive replication, all daughter DNA would contain some phosphorus DNA, so all of the cells would die.
Stent analyzed the death patterns of bacterial cells exposed to phosphorus in an attempt to determine the DNA replication mechanism. Stent found some distribution of the phosphorus label in daughter DNA helices, which indicated the presence of parental DNA. However, his findings were not conclusive enough to pinpoint the exact replication mechanism. Prior to , Stent theorized a model of DNA replication different from semi-conservative and dispersive replication.
In other words, all parts of the parental double helix were completely conserved, and none were passed down to the daughter DNA helix. In theory, for conservative replication, DNA strands did not have to unwind and separate. Unlike Stent, Levinthal did not use a mass spectrometer to examine differences in DNA containing phosphorus, but rather he examined the differing radioactivity of DNA molecules containing phosphorus Phosphorus is a radioactive isotope, meaning that it emits a special kind of high energy light, which can be measured.
Levinthal analyzed phosphorus distribution in bacteriophage DNA by examining radiation. However, like Stent, Levinthal was unable to draw specific conclusions from his results. The methods, whose names were coined by Stent, were conservative, semi-conservative, and dispersive replication.
Taylor labeled chromosomes in Vica faba , a type of bean, using phosphorus He found that with each replication, one subunit of a chromosome was conserved, while the other was not.
However, Taylor could not conclude that the DNA making up chromosomes also replicated semi-conservatively. Meselson and Stahl conducted their research at Caltech. Like Taylor, Meselson and Stahl did not study bacteriophages. Meselson and Stahl labeled DNA with heavy nitrogen isotopes. They then allowed that labeled DNA to replicate for many generations. By the mids, the scientific community accepted semi-conservative replication and the work of Meselson and Stahl.
However, perhaps more important than any one experiment, Holmes claims, was that scientists determined how DNA replicated through an international collaborative effort that consisted of years of theorizing, experimenting, and questioning. Those efforts led to experimentally confirming semi-conservative DNA replication, which formed the foundation for modern genetics, molecular biology, reproductive biology , and developmental biology. Sources Arley, Niels.
Davis, Tinsley H. Bloch, David P. William D. McElroy and Bentley Glass, — Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, Conceptually, semiconservative replication made sense in light of the double helix structural model of DNA, in particular its complementary nature and the fact that adenine always pairs with thymine and cytosine always pairs with guanine.
Looking at this model, it is easy to imagine that during replication, each strand serves as a template for the synthesis of a new strand, with complementary bases being added in the order indicated. Semiconservative replication was not the only model of DNA replication proposed during the mids, however. In fact, two other prominent hypotheses were put also forth: conservative replication and dispersive replication. According to the conservative replication model, the entire original DNA double helix serves as a template for a new double helix, such that each round of cell division produces one daughter cell with a completely new DNA double helix and another daughter cell with a completely intact old or original DNA double helix.
On the other hand, in the dispersive replication model, the original DNA double helix breaks apart into fragments, and each fragment then serves as a template for a new DNA fragment.
As a result, every cell division produces two cells with varying amounts of old and new DNA Figure 1. When these three models were first proposed, scientists had few clues about what might be occurring at the molecular level during DNA replication.
Fortunately, the models yielded different predictions about the distribution of old versus new DNA in newly divided cells, no matter what the underlying molecular mechanisms. These predictions were as follows:.
First, they grew several generations of E. Next, Meselson and Stahl transferred the E. DNA synthesized after the culture was transferred to the new growth medium was composed of 14 N as opposed to 15 N; thus, Meselson and Stahl could determine the distribution of original DNA containing 15 N and new DNA containing 14 N after replication.
Because the two nitrogen species have different densities, and appear at different positions in a density gradient, they could be differentiated in E.
The distribution of original DNA and new DNA after each round of replication was consistent with a semiconservative model of replication. Is it the conservative, dispersive, or semiconservative model? To answer this question experimentally, a population of E. After several generations of growth, DNA extracted from the E.
Under centrifugation, cesium chloride forms a density gradient, with heavier cesium ions occupying the bottom of the test tube, and decreasing in density from the bottom of the test tube to the top. DNA forms a band in the cesium chloride gradient, at the cesium chloride density level that corresponds to the density of the DNA. Thus, the density of the DNA can be measured by observing its position in the cesium chloride solution.
The DNA extracted from E. When E. Samples taken after additional rounds of replication appeared as two bands, as in the previous round of replication. Aware of previous studies that had relied on isotope labels as a way to differentiate between parental and progeny molecules, the scientists decided to see whether the same technique could be used to differentiate between parental and progeny DNA. If it could, Meselson and Stahl were hopeful that they would be able to determine which prediction and replication model was correct.
The duo thus began their experiment by choosing two isotopes of nitrogen—the common and lighter 14 N, and the rare and heavier 15 N so-called "heavy" nitrogen —as their labels and a technique known as cesium chloride CsCl equilibrium density gradient centrifugation as their sedimentation method. Meselson and Stahl opted for nitrogen because it is an essential chemical component of DNA; therefore, every time a cell divides and its DNA replicates, it incorporates new N atoms into the DNA of either one or both of its two daughter cells, depending on which model was correct.
The scientists then continued their experiment by growing a culture of E. In fact, they did this for 14 bacterial generations, which was long enough to create a population of bacterial cells that contained only the heavier isotope all the original 14 N-containing cells had died by then.
Next, they changed the medium to one containing only 14 N-labeled ammonium salts as the sole nitrogen source. Just prior to the addition of 14 N and periodically thereafter, as the bacterial cells grew and replicated, Meselson and Stahl sampled DNA for use in equilibrium density gradient centrifugation to determine how much 15 N from the original or old DNA versus 14 N from the new DNA was present. For the centrifugation procedure, they mixed the DNA samples with a solution of cesium chloride and then centrifuged the samples for enough time to allow the heavier 15 N and lighter 14 N DNA to migrate to different positions in the centrifuge tube.
Following a single round of replication, the DNA again formed a single distinct band, but the band was located in a different position along the centrifugation gradient. Specifically, it was found midway between where all the 15 N and all the 14 N DNA would have migrated—in other words, halfway between "heavy" and "light" Figure 2.
Based on these findings, the scientists were immediately able to exclude the conservative model of replication as a possibility. After all, if DNA replicated conservatively, there should have been two distinct bands after a single round of replication; half of the new DNA would have migrated to the same position as it did before the culture was transferred to the 14 N-containing medium i.
That left the scientists with only two options: either DNA replicated semiconservatively, as Watson and Crick had predicted, or it replicated dispersively.
To differentiate between the two, Meselson and Stahl had to let the cells divide again and then sample the DNA after a second round of replication. After that second round of replication, the scientists found that the DNA separated into two distinct bands: one in a position where DNA containing only 14 N would be expected to migrate, and the other in a position where hybrid DNA containing half 14 N and half 15 N would be expected to migrate.
The scientists continued to observe the same two bands after several subsequent rounds of replication. These results were consistent with the semiconservative model of replication and the reality that, when DNA replicated, each new double helix was built with one old strand and one new strand. If the dispersive model were the correct model, the scientists would have continued to observe only a single band after every round of replication.
Following publication of Meselson and Stahl's results, many scientists confirmed that semiconservative replication was the rule, not just in E. To date, no one has found any evidence for either conservative or dispersive DNA replication. Scientists have found, however, that semiconservative replication can occur in different ways—for example, it may proceed in either a circular or a linear fashion, depending on chromosome shape.
In fact, in the early s, English molecular biologist John Cairns performed another remarkably elegant experiment to demonstrate that E.
Specifically, Cairns grew E. But how does theta replication work? It turns out that this process results from the original double-stranded DNA unwinding at a single spot on the chromosome known as the replication origin. As the double helix unwinds, it creates a loop known as the replication bubble , with each newly separated single strand serving as a template for DNA synthesis. Replication occurs as the double helix unwinds. Eukaryotes undergo linear, not circular, replication. Conservative replication would have resulted in two bands; one representing the parental DNA still with exclusively 15 N in its nitrogenous bases and the other representing the daughter DNA with exclusively 14 N in its nitrogenous bases.
The single band actually seen indicated that all the DNA molecules contained equal amounts of both 15 N and 14 N. These results could only be explained if DNA replicates in a semi-conservative manner.
Dispersive replication would have resulted in exclusively a single band in each new generation, with the band slowly moving up closer to the height of the 14 N DNA band. Therefore, dispersive replication could also be ruled out. When two daughter DNA copies are formed, they have the identical sequences to one another and identical sequences to the original parental DNA, and the two daughter DNAs are divided equally into the two daughter cells, producing daughter cells that are genetically identical to one another and genetically identical to the parent cell.
Key Takeaways. Key Points There were three models suggested for DNA replication: conservative, semi-conservative, and dispersive. The conservative method of replication suggests that parental DNA remains together and newly-formed daughter strands are also together. The semi-conservative method of replication suggests that the two parental DNA strands serve as a template for new DNA and after replication, each double-stranded DNA contains one strand from the parental DNA and one new daughter strand.
The dispersive method of replication suggests that, after replication, the two daughter DNAs have alternating segments of both parental and newly-synthesized DNA interspersed on both strands. Meselson and Stahl, using E. Key Terms DNA replication : a biological process occuring in all living organisms that is the basis for biological inheritance isotope : any of two or more forms of an element where the atoms have the same number of protons, but a different number of neutrons within their nuclei.
0コメント