His weight makes him an easy target, and his lack of contribution to the group frustrates many of the boys. For the most part, he was protected by Ralph, the leader of the island. However, he becomes a casualty when Jack takes control of the island. After taking over, Jack and Ralph fight while Piggy stands off to the side, blind as a bat due to Jack stealing his glasses.
In the middle of the altercation, a boulder is launched from a catapult-like contraption, hitting Piggy square in the face. This is the one quote where parents have some cause for concern, as the scene in which he dies is fairly graphic compared to others in the book.
His dead body is described in some detail, and his killing is more purposeful and sadistic than the other acts of violence in the book, which are either for food or somewhat an accident.
Piggy is a symbol of wisdom, as he is mostly the voice of reason among the boys on the island. His death is the end of any notions of making a somewhat functional or intelligent society on the island. Also, his dead body being compared to …show more content… It has been frequently challenged by parents that are concerned about its amount of violence and the inference that humans are nothing more than animals when left alone.
It should not be banned because the presence of violence is meaningful and is necessary to the overall meaning of the book, which holds significant literary merit and should not be kept away from students who have a thirst for knowledge.
Every human has both good and evil within them, and what type of person they are decides which. Show More. Read More. Facts About Pitbulls Words 6 Pages They have instincts like every other animal trying to protect themselves and they react to it because they know what they are doing. Lord Of The Flies Bullying Analysis Words 2 Pages At the beginning of the story, Golding introduces a boy named Piggy, a fat, intelligent boy, who feels shy about himself and loses his self-confidence through the story.
Yummy Quotes Words 3 Pages American Psychological Association studies found children who are emotionally abused and neglected face similar and sometimes worse mental health problems than kids who have sexually and physically abused.
The subject of humans being savage is clearly present in Lord of the Flies. The transformation of the previously mild mannered school boys is shocking. The contrast of their attitudes and behaviors from the beginning and the end of the novel is apparent.
Or animals? Or savages? Many view this transformation of character as a theme and message that humans are inherently evil and uncivilized. Scholar Leon Levitt argues this notion. Therefore he is saying that the evil is not natural, but rather created. Most challenges on Lord of the Flies have been made without this viewpoint in mind. Would this change how the book is viewed? Would people become even more upset or would they take the message and reassess some aspects of society and life?
Another significant symbol used in this novel that offended people who challenged it is the painted faces of the boys who becomes hunters and savages. Some have claimed this to be racist, comparing these boys to people in real life who still do paint their faces to hunt as part of traditional practice. Thereby they believe that Golding is comparing this practice to uncivilized savagery. Kimlyn Bender, a Jamestown College professor, thinks otherwise. He wrote an article specifically about the themes that lie behind this face painting.
Lord of the Flies has become a staple reading assignment in most curriculum across the United States and other countries over the past few decades. A fairly large amount of people have read this book, and are familiar with its concepts and ideas. I feel a significant fact to mention is that Lord of the Flies , according to the ALA has not been banned, or even challenged in the past 16 years.
This is most likely due to more content being published or presented that proves to be much more questionable than the ideas that were previously questioned in Lord of the Flies. There are other ideas also presented such as discrimination. Have we become desensitized to certain ideas because more graphic and vulgar ones take their place?
One can only guess or assume what a proper sensibility, and sense of moral compass contains. This is due to the blatant fact that everyone is different. In my opinion, a banning of Lord of the Flies is unnecessary. The novel provides a valuable insight into people and society.
However, this is just my personal opinion. In , it was challenged, but retained on the ninth-grade accelerated English reading list in Bloomfield, NY. In April , a group called The Florida Citizens Alliance pushed for legislation in Florida to ban approximately 90 books including Lord of The Flies , but were rebuffed by lawmakers who upheld the first amendment. According to the American Library Association, Lord of the Flies is the eighth-most frequently banned and challenged book in the nation.
0コメント